Skip to content
The EdDen team sitting together on a step after winning Hopstart, holding the trophy.

2023–24 · Design

EdDen

Co-founded an AI lesson-planning startup that cut planning time 75% for teachers in five schools and won two Johns Hopkins competitions, before we shut down over co-founder priorities. Co-founder, product & GTM, Aug 2023–Feb 2024.

Co-founder, Product & GTM · Baltimore, MD · Aug 2023 – Feb 2024

Customer discoveryProduct designConversational AI UXDashboardsPitching

Results

−75% planning time9 hrs/wk back per teacher5 schools

Context

EdDen was an AI lesson-planning tool for K-12 teachers. As co-founder I led product and go-to-market: the survey and interview research, the design of the whole beta, and the pitch deck.

The team won the pitch competition at Johns Hopkins's annual business plan competition, took first place and funding at the Johns Hopkins Spark Accelerator, and joined the NSF I-Corps program. We had three advisors: the head of a computer-oriented learning lab at Johns Hopkins, a managing partner at an education consulting firm that advises companies with $50 million to $2 billion in revenue, and a former business-strategy lead at Ngrade (acquired by McGraw Hill for $55 million) who also served as a special assistant to President Bush at the U.S. Department of Education.

Problem

Teachers spend hours every week building lesson plans, time that comes out of teaching, feedback, and their own lives. General-purpose AI could help but wasn't shaped for how teachers plan, find materials, or keep files.

North starHours a teacher spends planning each week.

Decisions

Decision 01

Research before designing

Evidence
More than 200 survey responses and two rounds of user interviews with teachers.
Chose
Design the beta around what teachers said they needed: a conversational AI for planning, resource search, file management, and dashboards.
Didn't build
Features we couldn't tie back to a survey or interview finding.
Cost
Research took time we could have spent shipping.
Decision 02

Put a working beta in real classrooms early

Evidence
Teachers in five schools used the beta.
Chose
Get the product in front of teachers in five schools and measure planning time there, rather than keep polishing before release.
Cost
The beta was rough, and it made our gaps visible to the people we most needed to impress.
Decision 03

Close it down

Evidence
The co-founders' priorities had diverged.
Chose
Shut down the company instead of continuing with a team that wasn't pulling in one direction.
Cost
Ending a product with traction, funding, and five schools behind it.

Solution

The beta gave teachers a conversational AI to plan lessons, a way to search resources, file management, and dashboards. I designed every screen; wireframes are shown below.

Outcome

Teachers using the beta cut lesson planning time by 75%, getting about nine hours a week back. Five schools used it. We won the pitch competition at the Johns Hopkins business plan competition and first place with funding at the Spark Accelerator.

We closed the company in February 2024 because the co-founders' priorities had diverged.

Do differently

  1. Agree on the commitment each founder was making, in writing, before taking funding and competition prizes.
  2. Get planning-time measurement into the product from the first beta, so the 75% figure is a tracked number and not a survey answer.
  3. Line up an engineering owner before the pitches, so the plan didn't depend on one co-founder's availability.
Next project splitEV